How Old Is the Moon? A new analysis of lunar rocks brought to Earth by Apollo astronauts suggests that the moon formed 4. Some previous studies have come up with similar estimates, while others have argued for a younger moon that coalesced million to million years after the solar system was born. The new finding, which was published today Jan. The moon’s birth Astronomers think the moon was born after a Mars-size body or a series of such big objects slammed into the early Earth. Some of the material blasted into space coalesced to form Earth’s nearest neighbor, the thinking goes.
How Old Is the Moon? Scientists Say They Finally Know
The Radiometric Dating Game Radiometric dating methods estimate the age of rocks using calculations based on the decay rates of radioactive elements such as uranium, strontium, and potassium. On the surface, radiometric dating methods appear to give powerful support to the statement that life has existed on the earth for hundreds of millions, even billions, of years. We are told that these methods are accurate to a few percent, and that there are many different methods.
It has been estimated that it would have taken less than years for the C to reach its present level of concentration.
At the time that Darwin’s On the Origin of Species was published, the earth was “scientifically” determined to be million years old. By , it was found to be 1. In , science firmly established that the earth was 3. Finally in , it was discovered that the earth is “really” 4. In these early studies the order of sedimentary rocks and structures were used to date geologic time periods and events in a relative way.
At first, the use of “key” diagnostic fossils was used to compare different areas of the geologic column. Although there were attempts to make relative age estimates, no direct dating method was available until the twentieth century. However, before this time some very popular indirect methods were available. For example, Lord Kelvin had estimated the ages of both the Earth and the Sun based on cooling rates.
The answer of 25 million years deduced by Kelvin was not received favorably by geologists.
How Good Are Those Young-Earth Arguments?
See this page in: Hungarian , Russian , Spanish People who ask about carbon 14C dating usually want to know about the radiometric  dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years. People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history. Clearly, such huge time periods cannot be fitted into the Bible without compromising what the Bible says about the goodness of God and the origin of sin, death and suffering —the reason Jesus came into the world See Six Days?
Among them are many human tracks, including a path of 14 human steps which cross over and sometimes even step directly into the dinosaur tracks.
There are lots of ways to guesstimate ages, and geologists knew the earth was old a long time ago and I might add that they were mostly Christian creationist geologists. But they didn’t know how old. Radiometric dating actually allows the measurement of absolute ages, and so it is deadly to the argument that the earth cannot be more than 10, years old.
Radiometric methods measure the time elapsed since the particular radiometric clock was reset. Radiocarbon dating, which is probably best known in the general public, works only on things that were once alive and are now dead. It measures the time elapsed since death, but is limited in scale to no more than about 50, years ago.
How accurate are Carbon-14 and other radioactive dating methods?
Public Opinion Introduction The television, newspapers, and textbooks commonly proclaim, as though it were proven fact, that the earth is 4 to 5 billion years old. What is not commonly taught is how the scientists determined that age. What assumptions did they make?
The flatness means that the lava is a contiguous mass, and can still be reached from the hot magma by a continuous path of hot rock.
The assumption that the geologic column is a base from which to calibrate the C dates is not wise. With a half-life of only years, carbon dating has nothing to do with dating the geological ages! Whether by sloppiness or gross ignorance, Dr. Hovind is confusing the carbon “clock” with other radiometric “clocks. Being ancient, the C content has long since decayed away and that makes it useful in “zeroing” laboratory instruments. It’s just one of the tricks that have been used to make the work a little more precise.
The entire geologic column is based on the assumption that evolution is true. Radiometric Dating and the Geological Time Scale: Circular Reasoning or Reliable Tools? Andrew MacRae deals with claims that the geologic column is just circular reasoning.
Red horse head, below and to the left of the yellow horse heads. These horse heads and signs are in a small alcove, above a flat floor. Just a few lines have been used to outline more clearly the shape of a small mammoth, about 20 cm wide, taken up by the flowstone or stalagmite cascade at the entrance to the Brunel Chamber. I have highlighted the shape in the right hand photograph.
The zone is heavily covered with calcite.
Stewart June 2nd Peter 2: We read in Matthew 8: God bound some of the worst angels into Hell right away; but banned the others to the earth with Lucifer And, behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God? So they didn’t fall in that sense. There is no record in the Old Testament of rebellious angels being cast down to the earth. Clearly, they must have been cast down to a Pre-Adamic world.
There is plenty of Scriptural evidences to support this doctrine: Satan was already present in the Garden Of Eden Revelation
Changing Views of the History of the Earth
The isochron method Many radioactive dating methods are based on minute additions of daughter products to a rock or mineral in which a considerable amount of daughter-type isotopes already exists. These isotopes did not come from radioactive decay in the system but rather formed during the original creation of the elements.
In this case, it is a big advantage to present the data in a form in which the abundance of both the parent and daughter isotopes are given with respect to the abundance of the initial background daughter. The incremental additions of the daughter type can then be viewed in proportion to the abundance of parent atoms.
Again, the stories are evaluated according to their own success in agreeing with the existing long ages belief system.
Leibnitz reworked Descartes’s cosmogony. Protogea was published much later in An essay toward a Natural History of the Earth. Woodward came down fairly strongly for the view that the flood was an act of God that could not be accounted for by normal physical processes. He also postulated hydrological sorting to account for the ordering of fossils. Whiston added comets to Burnet’s cosmogony as the source of the waters of the flood.
Lectures and Discourse of Earthquakes and Subterranean Eruptions. Hooke believed that the fossils were the remains of extinct species and could not be accounted for by the Flood. Using Descartes’s cosmology, the assumption that the earth was once entirely flooded, and the observation that the sea level was dropping three inches per century near his home, he calculated the age of the earth to be greater than 2 billion years. Observation sur la Formation des Montagnards Pallas made extensive observations of Russian mountains.
He observed the results of processes that acted on mountains, e.
Correlation issues[ edit ] In a steady effort ongoing since , the International Commission on Stratigraphy has been working to correlate the world’s local stratigraphic record into one uniform planet-wide benchmarked system. American geologists have long considered the Mississippian and Pennsylvanian to be periods in their own right though the ICS now recognises them both as ‘subperiods’ of the Carboniferous Period recognised by European geologists.
Cases like this in China, Russia and even New Zealand with other geological eras has slowed down the uniform organization of the stratigraphic record.
So to me it seems quite conceivable that there is no correlation at all between the results of different methods on the geologic column, and that they have a purely random relationship to each other.
Half-life is the time taken for half of the radioactive nuclei to decay. Half-life is the time taken for the count rate to fall to half of its original reading. There are a number of ways to define half-life. Remember one of the above definitions, it may be useful in the exams. An Explanation of Half-life. A radioactive material will have some nuclei that are stable and some that are unstable.
The stable nuclei don’t change, that is what stable means. In the picture below, the unstable nuclei shown as brown balls will change into stable nuclei shown as purple balls and emit radioactivity. Half-life is a measure of the time taken for the unstable nuclei to change into stable nuclei. Different substances do this at different rates. Some do it very quickly and half of the unstable nuclei decay in less than one second.
Some do it very slowly and half of the unstable nuclei take billions of years to decay.
Radiometric dating In , shortly after the discovery of radioactivity , the American chemist Bertram Boltwood suggested that lead is one of the disintegration products of uranium, in which case the older a uranium-bearing mineral the greater should be its proportional part of lead. Analyzing specimens whose relative geologic ages were known, Boltwood found that the ratio of lead to uranium did indeed increase with age. After estimating the rate of this radioactive change, he calculated that the absolute ages of his specimens ranged from million to 2.
Though his figures were too high by about 20 percent, their order of magnitude was enough to dispose of the short scale of geologic time proposed by Lord Kelvin. Versions of the modern mass spectrometer were invented in the early s and s, and during World War II the device was improved substantially to help in the development of the atomic bomb.
Russell , quoted in Dalrymple Arthur Holmes publishes a booklet on the age of the Earth, which becomes fairly popular.
Herbchronology Dating methods in archaeology[ edit ] Same as geologists or paleontologists , archaeologists are also brought to determine the age of ancient materials, but in their case the areas of their studies are restricted to the history of both ancient and recent humans. Thus, to be considered as archaeological, the remains, objects or artifacts to be dated must be related to human activity. It is commonly assumed that if the remains or elements to be dated are older than the human species, the disciplines which study them are sciences such geology or paleontology, among some others.
Nevertheless, the range of time within archaeological dating can be enormous compared to the average lifespan of a singular human being. As an example Pinnacle Point ‘s caves, in the southern coast of South Africa , provided evidence that marine resources shellfish have been regularly exploited by humans as of , years ago.
It was the case of an 18th-century sloop whose excavation was led in South Carolina United States in Dating material drawn from the archaeological record can be made by a direct study of an artifact , or may be deduced by association with materials found in the context the item is drawn from or inferred by its point of discovery in the sequence relative to datable contexts. Dating is carried out mainly post excavation , but to support good practice, some preliminary dating work called ” spot dating ” is usually run in tandem with excavation.
Dating is very important in archaeology for constructing models of the past, as it relies on the integrity of dateable objects and samples.
No parent—daughter value for a closed system is involved, rather just a single isotopic measurement of lead viewed with respect to the expected evolution of lead in the Earth.